Photographs and thoughts on photography and camera collecting
This is one of occasional pictures where I have difficulty explaining why I took it. Maybe it was because of the colorful vehicles set against the rather drab background? Maybe it was all the sings? Or maybe I just liked the way it looked?
Taken with a Sony A7IV and Voigtländer 35mm f2.5
Way back in 2011 I bought a camera (a Sony Nex 5N). I had recently started collecting old cameras and I’d read that this camera could (with the appropriate inexpensive adapter) allow you to use vintage lens with it. I had picked up some vintage lenses with the old cameras I’d bought so I thought I’d give it a try.
I would have to focus the camera manually, so I don’t really know what possessed me to decide that street photography (where things move a lot) was the best way to start (i.e. rather than something which doesn’t move much at all like a landscape).
The pictures below were all taken in Manhattan the first day I tried this experiment. I was very pleased with the results. Subsequently I took quite a lot of photos with vintage lenses on a digital camera. But after a while I returned to auto focus, which I’ve been using for some time now. However, I’ve now decided to start a project using vintage lenses exclusively. We’ll see how it goes.
Taken with a Sony Nex 5N and Canon 50mm f1.4 SSC FD
I decided I needed an ultrawide lens for my Fuji cameras. It’s a Fuji XF 10-24mm f4 R OIS (the earlier version rather than the later version that among other things improved the weather sealing that many complained about the lack of, something that’s not all that important to me.
There’s a useful review of it on Optical Limits. The conclusion reads:
If you read our analysis so far, you may have noticed a few negative findings but this has to be seen in a context. Ultra-wide lenses are never flawless and the Fujinon XF 10-24mm f/4 R OIS is actually one of the best representative of its species. It is very sharp in the image center and the border- and corner quality is very decent. Lateral chromatic aberrations are also low. Yes, image distortion and vignetting can be very noticeable at the extreme wide end but most users will probably take advantage of image auto-correction here anyway. In terms of build quality, we are highly impressed. Fujinon lenses are better than most here anyway but Fujifilm has reached a new level here. However, even so it is a bit disappointing that they didn’t provide weather sealing. While it isn’t something unusual anymore, we certainly appreciate the image stabilizer which actually lifts the low light capabilities of this zoom lens beyond the two ultra-wide prime lenses (Zeiss Touit 12mm f/2.8 and Fujinon XF 14mm f/2.8 R) of the system. If you are still not convinced by now … the author will keep the lens in his private stock. Consequently … highly recommended!
I’d agree. To me it feels relatively light, sturdy, well balanced and very comfortable to use. I can see it staying on my Fuji X-E3 for quite a while.
Taken with a Sony A7IV and Venus Optics Laowa 85mm f5.6
After charging the battery I decided to take my newly acquired Pentax to nearby Sleepy Hollow Cemetery in Sleepy Hollow, NY to confirm that it was working and see how it handled.
So how did things go. Well, the pictures weren’t bad for essentially quick snapshots. I even quite like a few of them. It was a very dull day and the camera/lens combination was not the best for those conditions: old sensor (2006 vintage) that’s not good in low light combined with a old, slow zoom lens (18-55mm SMC Pentax DA f3.5-f5.6). Added to that I made a stupid mistake: of course the camera was used and in my enthusiasm to try it out I forgot to check out how the previous owner had set it up. Turns out he’d set it up in a way that practically guaranteed slow shutter speeds. I thought they were ok for hand holding, but it seems that they weren’t and this led to soft and in some cases, blurry pictures. Still I enjoyed the 1 1/2 hour walk, the camera was fun to use and I learned a lot about it. I’ll do better next time.
Taken with a Pentax K10 and 18-55mm SMC Pentax DA f3.5-f5.6
According to the Sleepy Hollow Fire Department‘s website:
The Sleepy Hollow Fire Department consists of five individual fire companies. The council of the Fire Department consists of the three chiefs and two wardens from each of the five companies. This council is the governing body of the department and sets all policy. The board of fire wardens answers to the Village Board of Trustees.
Sleepy Hollow Fire Patrol
Sleepy Hollow’s fire patrol and emergency rescue squad was organized on May 26, 1876; it is the oldest company in the department. Originally chartered as a company for the protection of property at a fire, the company is now charged with the protection of life. Fire patrol is used on auto accidents and carries a Hurst tool for the extraction of victims. The company also carries as part of their equipment air-bags which are used to raise an object to free trapped victims. Today the company operates a 1992 International rescue vehicle, fully equipped for any emergency.
Pocantico Hook and Ladder Company Co. No. 1- The Big “6”
An act of the Westchester County Court organized Pocantico Hook and Ladder company on September 24, 1878. Pocantico Hook and Ladder’s main responsibilities at an alarm are search, rescue and ventilation.
Rescue Hose Company No. 1
Rescue Hose, the third oldest company and the first hose company, was organized on November 8, 1887. Rescue Hose was originally located in the Beekman Ave firehouse along with Pocantico and Fire Patrol. On December 27, 1929, Rescue moved into its present quarters on Lawrence Avenue.
Union Hose Engine Company No. 2
The second hose company was organized on December 15, 1887 in the quarters of Pocantico Hook and Ladder. The company moved to a building on the corner of Valley and College Avenue and then in 1928 moved to their present quarters on Cortlandt Street.
Columbia Hose Company No. 3
Columbia Hose Company No. 3 was organized on May 22, 1899 as Sleepy Hollow Company, changing a few months later to the present name. The company was formed to protect the uphill section of the Village known as Briggsville. The first company quarters was located on Webber Avenue. The company has had several quarters since then, moving from Webber Avenue to Broadway, to Valley Street, and then in 1940 after the completion of the municipal building on Beekman Avenue, the company was moved to its present quarters in this building. Today Columbia Hose carries a second Hurst Tool for extraction of trapped victims.
Taken with a Pentax K10 and 18-55mm SMC Pentax DA f3.5-f5.6