Kensico Cemetery – Overview

“Kensico Cemetery, located in Valhalla, Westchester County, New York was founded in 1889, when many New York City cemeteries were becoming full, and rural cemeteries were being created near the railroads that served the city. Initially 250 acres (1.0 km2), it was expanded to 600 acres (2.4 km2) in 1905 but reduced to 461 acres (1.87 km2) in 1912, when a portion was sold to the neighboring Gate of Heaven Cemetery. The cemetery has a special section for members of the Actors’ Fund of America and the National Vaudeville Association, some of whom died in abject poverty. The cemetery contains four Commonwealth war graves, of three Canadian Army soldiers of World War I and a repatriated American Royal Air Force airman of World War II. As of December 2021, eight Major League Baseball players are buried here, including Baseball Hall of Fame inductee Lou Gehrig. Many entertainment figures of the early twentieth century, including Russian-born Sergei Rachmaninoff, were buried here.” (Adapted from Wikipedia, which also provides a long list of the well-known people buried there).

Apart from my fascination with cemeteries it was this latter was what brought me to the ceremony. I wanted to find the final resting places of Sergei Rachmaninoff (because I like his music) as well as a that of Danny Kaye (UNICEF‘s first Goodwill Ambassador. I worked for UNICEF for about 38 years). I failed on both counts. After walking around for about three hours, following the map I couldn’t find either of them. By this time, I was hungry, tired and my feet hurt. I sat down for a couple of minutes and took a look at the Find a Grave website, which has GPS Co-ordinates for graves. From this I discovered that there was no way that could ever have found these graves using the map, because the map is just wrong: the graves are not in the locations marked by the map. Now I know where they are I guess I’ll have to go back again.

While it’s a pleasant enough cemetery with its open landscapes, attractive mausoleums, nice statuary etc. it’s not one of my favorites. I tend to prefer older cemeteries, where the old, crumbling gravestones are packed tightly together.

Taken with a Fujifilm X-E3 and Sigma 18-50 f2.8

Trying out Infrared Photography – First Attempt

For my first attempt at infrared photography I decided to go to one of my favorite haunts: Sleepy Hollow Cemetery and the Old Dutch Burying Grounds. I really hadn’t a clue what I was doing and expected the results to be a disaster. I was surprised that, after some post-processing I quite happy with the results. This confirmed my desire to keep trying.



















Taken with a Sony F828 and fixed Zeiss 28-200mm f2-2.8

Trying out Infrared Photography – Exploring the Options

I’ve been somewhat interested in trying infrared photography for some time. However, in my reading about it, it seemed as if there were only three ways of getting into it.

  1. Buy an infrared filter and put in on one of my lenses. This is by far the least expensive option requiring just the purchase of the filter. But the filter cuts out so much light that exposure times are very long. That means that you always have to use a tripod, and even then can’t take pictures when its windy. Anything that that blows in the wind (e.g. leaves, flowers, grasses, clouds etc.) will blur. So unless you really like this look it’s not a viable option.
  2. Buy an infrared camera. But apparently there are only a few of these. They’re mostly used for scientific applications and are extremely expensive. So not a viable option either.
  3. Have one of your cameras converted to infrared or buy one that’s already been converted. Both of these are fairly expensive. For the former you have to permanently devote one of your cameras to infrared (once its been converted you can’t easily go back). Moreover, the conversion costs around $300. The cost of buying an already converted camera includes the cost of a used camera plus the cost of the conversion, in all about $500 upwards depending on the camera you choose. Again not a great option if you’re not sure you’re going to like infrared photography and don’t want to pay a lot to find out.

So what is a person to do if they’d like to see if they like infrared, but don’t want to pay a lot of money in case they don’t.

Well, it turns out that there is a fourth option, and that takes us back to the camera in the preceding post (See: Another newly acquired old camera: Sony F828). The final line in that post includes the sentence: “But there’s something very special, even unique about this camera”.

Mike Eckman describes it better, and more succinctly that I can:

Of all the reasons to consider the DSC-F828, it’s most unique feature are it’s Night Shot and Night Framing features which use a hinged visual light filter that can be moved out of the way to turn the camera into a full spectrum digital camera that when used with an IR filter allows for infrared digital photos. An additional feature of the camera is one Sony likely never intended, which is to place a magnet on a specific part of the camera to manually deactivate the feature, making the DSC-F828 one of the few digital cameras ever made that can shoot IR and back to normal without any internal modification of the camera.

He goes on to explain:

One particularly interesting feature that was introduced in the the earlier DSC-F707 which made it into the DSC-F828, is what Sony called “Night Shot” which was an infrared technology borrowed from their higher end camcorders. Night shot (and the similar “Night Framing” modes) rely on both an IR emitter on the front of the camera, and the ability for a visible light filter that is normally placed in front of the digital camera sensor to swivel out of the way. To better understand Sony’s Night Shot feature, you need to know a little more about how digital camera sensors and the human eye perceive light.

In high school science class, you may remember that light travels as a wave. Light is all around us in a variety of wavelengths, some the human eye can see, some that it can’t. A wave consists of peaks and troughs. The distance between two peaks or two troughs is called the wavelength. As the wavelength changes, the properties of the light change as well.

For most people, the human eye can detect light with a wavelength of between 380 and 750 nanometers (there are 1 million nanometers in a millimeter). We perceive light between these two wavelengths as color, with violet on the low end and red on the high end. Beyond the visible spectrum of light on the low end is ultra-violet light, and on the high end is infrared. Light beyond the visible spectrum is around us all the time, we just cannot see it, at least not without help.

As the wavelength of visible light changes, the eye perceives it as color. Image courtesy, lightcolourvision.com.
All digital camera sensors made back then and today, can detect a wider spectrum of light that can see beyond what the human eye can see, from about 350 to 1000 nanometers. While the difference on the low end between 350 nm and 380 nm is small and would have little effect on the sensor’s performance, the difference on the high end from the 750 nm limit of the human eye to the 1000 nm limit of the sensor, is a problem.

All digital cameras have a visible light filter in front of the image sensor that blocks unwanted IR and UV light from being detected by the sensor.

In order to more closely match the spectrum that the human eye can see to what a digital sensor can see, all digital cameras have a visible light filter applied over the sensor to restrict the light that passes through it. Without this filter, digital sensors would be taking in more information than is needed, which would change the look of the images that the camera displays.

Cameras with Sony’s Night Shot feature have that same filter over the sensor to block unwanted wavelengths, however unlike most other digital cameras, that filter is on a hinge and can be electronically controlled by the camera for special purpose photography. Combined with an IR emitter on the front of the camera, which is essentially a flashlight that only emits IR which our eyes (and filtered digital sensors) cannot see, when used together, the visible light filter moves out of the way, allowing the sensor to see the full spectrum of light, including the IR light being projected from the front of the camera. Since the human eye cannot see this light, but the camera can, the sensor is able to focus on the IR light in complete darkness.

Sony uses this feature in two different ways. In the main Night Shot mode, IR light is emitted by the camera, the visible light filter moves out of the way, and the camera takes pictures of just the IR light in complete darkness. Although IR light cannot be seen by the human eye, the sensor can now see it, and it stores these images with the IR light changed to green, giving that “night vision” look that is often associated with electronic night vision devices. Although Night Shot images are presented in green monochrome without any other colors, they are an effective way of photographing objects such as sleeping babies in complete darkness.

A second Night Framing mode starts out the same way, using the IR emitted to shine light over a dark scene, and the visible light filter moves out of the way so that the digital sensor can focus and meter for whatever you are attempting to photograph, but at the moment of exposure, the IR emitter turns off, the visible light filter moves back in front of the sensor, and the camera fires it’s flash and shutter to capture a normal flash image in full color of objects in complete or very low light.

For anyone whose ever attempted to take photographs in complete darkness, you’ve likely encountered difficulties with the camera being able to focus on and meter for the extremely dark scenes. Even modern digital cameras and smartphone cameras today still struggle in very low light as they simply cannot “see” objects in complete darkness. With Night Framing mode, the camera uses it’s Night Shot technology to focus and meter for your shot, but then makes a normal flash exposure using the information it obtained using the IR light.

The Sony CyberShot DSC-F828 would be Sony’s last camera in the series and the last with the Night Shot feature. A combination of some scandalous uses of the feature, plus a widespread misunderstanding of the technology caused it’s removal in future models. By the mid 2000s, DSLRs had gained much more popularity as did more traditionally styled point and shoot’s so an oddly shaped top of the line camera with a $1000 price tag likely caused it to sell poorly.

Sony would never release a camera with the Night Shot feature again, and to the best of my knowledge, no other camera maker did either meaning these features are unique among this family of cameras in that they could do something that the best cameras today can’t.

When attaching an external magnet to a specific location in this area of the camera, you can override the built in visible light filter and move it out of the way, turning the DSC-F828 into a full spectrum camera.

I could probably end this review here, talking about a neat camera with a strange design and some cool features and that would make for a pretty interesting look back, but I’d be leaving out one more unintentional feature.

When Sony designed the visible light filter that could be moved out of the way of the digital sensor, they controlled it with magnets. At some point, some clever owners of these cameras discovered that if you used a small and powerful magnet, and attached it to the camera in a specific location, you could manually move the filter out of the way, essentially turning the camera into a full spectrum digital camera.

Now, you might be thinking, why would anyone want to do this? I thought you said that the reason these filters exist in the first place is to filter out light we can’t see, and that by including that light, we’d have undesirable images?

Using a magnet to manually disable the digital sensor’s filter, you can shoot the camera in full spectrum mode, that when used with a screw on IR filter, allows you to shoot infrared photographs in daylight.
That is true, however by eliminating the filter and exposing the sensor to the full 350 nm to 1000 nm spectrum, you can use screw on filters to pick and choose which wavelengths you want the sensor to see. Since we know that IR light is around us all the time but we can’t see it, by using a full spectrum digital sensor and a screw on IR filter, you can turn the camera into an IR only camera, something Sony never designed the camera to do. When used as intended, the Night Shot mode limits the aperture and shutter speed to only specific settings to optimize low light photography. With the camera in it’s “normal” mode, but the visible light filter out of the way, the camera doesn’t have these limitations, allowing you a full spectrum of f/stops and shutter speeds, while still shooting IR photos.

Shooting a full spectrum digital camera with an IR filter in bright sunlight will produce images with otherworldly colors. Lush green trees will turn white, blues and reds will take on a purple or sometimes yellow hue. By mixing different color filters and some clever post processing, you can make your local nature park look like an alien landscape.

There is a small niche of digital photographers who will open up their cameras and permanently remove the IR filter that is permanently attached to their sensor to achieve this effect. But once these cameras are modified, they are not easily returned to normal, meaning they will only work in IR mode. Furthermore, most cameras that are modified this way are usually point and shoots as they’re the easiest to work with.

With the Sony DSC-F828 and the two models that came before it, swapping back and forth between full spectrum and normal mode is just as simple as attaching and removing a magnet. You can change back and forth as often as you like with no damage to the camera!

Today, because of this ability, plus it’s excellent f/2 Carl Zeiss lens, 8 megapixel sensor, ability to write RAW files, and it’s screw on filter mount which makes using IR filters very easy, the Sony DSC-F828 has developed a bit of a cult following for IR photographers. These cameras are one of the easiest entry points into IR photography, and for those times you want to turn the feature off, you still have a pretty good regular digital camera.

So I got the magnet and some inexpensive Infrared filters and off I went to try this setup out.

The results of my efforts will follow in the next few posts.

A tale of two tombstones and the fall of a great banking dynasty

In an earlier post (See: V. Everit Macy Grave Site) I mentioned that I had been surprised to find not only that the Speyer grave site was right next to it, but also that I had already taken a picture of it. The gravesite contains the graves of James Speyer, Ellin Prince Speyer (his wife), Herbert Beit von Speyer (his nephew, his obituary can be found here) and Ellin Beit von Speyer (his niece). For more on the Speyer family see here.




One of the reasons I might have missed this grave site may be that back in 2020 when I was last there it didn’t look the way it does now. You can see from this picture that it was rather dirty. The picture at the top of this post shows it as it looks today. It’s obviously been cleaned recently. Another reason might have been that I was rather taken by the impressive carving and didn’t think to look down at the grave.


I’ve mentioned in earlier posts that I’m particularly interested in the Speyer Family because my house is on the site of Waldheim, the mansion built by James Speyer in Briarcliff Manor, NY. I even have some vestiges of former estate buildings in and around my garden (See: Some Ruins). Because of this interest I recently acquired a copy of “The Fall of the House of Speyer. The Story of a Banking Dynasty” by George W. Liebmann. I haven’t read it yet, but it looks interesting. The book sleeve describes it as follows:

The dramatic story of the last fifty years of the Speyer investment banking family, a Jewish family of German descent, is surprisingly little known today, yet at the turn of the twentieth century, Speyer was the third largest investment banking firm in the United States, behind only Morgan and Kuhn, Loeb. It had branches in London, Frankfurt and New York, and the projects it financed included the Southern Pacific Railroad, the Los Angelese Aqueduct, the London Underground, the infrastructure of the new Cuban Republic, and the major railroads of Mexico, Brazil, Bolivia, Ecuador, and the Philippines. Later, it was the first major banking firm to finance Germany’s Weimar Republic, as well as providing the League of Nations loans to Hungary, Greece and Bulgaria and the newly invented revenue bonds for the Port of New York Authority.

Equally remarkable were the philanthropy achievements of the two brothers who ran the firm – James Speyer in New York and Edgar Speyer in London – and their families. These included sponsorship of the London Proms, the King Edward VII and Poplar Hospitals and the Whitechapel Art Gallery in England; The University Settlement, the Speyer Animal Hospital, the Speyer School for Gifted and Talented Children, the Provident Loan Society and the Museum of the City of New York in the United States and the University of Frankfurt and the sulfa drug research of Paul Ehrlich in Germany.

Yet, the firm was doomed by the nationalist passions aroused by World War I. Its English partner was denaturalised and exiled; its American partner enjoyed reduced standing because of its German ancestry; and the firm’s Frankfurt branch withered from want of capital and closed with the coming of the Third Reich, its German partner fleeing into exile. The firm was dissolved in 1939, just before the outbreak of war, and a surprisingly anticlimactic end to one of the great international banking houses of modern times.

Once I’ve finished it I’ll donate it to the Briarcliff Manor-Scarborough Historical Society.

First three pictures taken with a Sony RX100 M3, fourth picture with a Sony A6000 with Sony E 18-55mm f3.5-5.6 OSS.