I came across this blog from Kirk Tuck’s wonderful site: The Visual Science Lab.
This blog’s ‘About’ page says the following:
I’m a cranky old bastard who has been taking crappy pictures for 20 years or so. I’m full of opinions and ideas about photography, but not terribly good at putting them into practice. So it goes.
This blog is a place for me to put those ideas and opinions, so that I don’t have to keep them bottled up inside, nor try to explain them off the cuff and on the fly.
There’s much to like in this blog. The author seems to be very knowledgeable in a number of areas. He writes well and is often quite amusing. As he suggests in his ‘About’ section he’s “full of opinions and ideas about photography” and he’s certainly not afraid to voice them. He’s also quite prolific so there’s no want of things to read. As I only came across his blog yesterday I spent a large part of the day reading it and I thoroughly enjoyed it. I also learned a great deal.
For a photography blog I was surprised to find so little actual photography. The blog is virtually devoid of photographs. Maybe he likes to keep his opinion pieces separate from his photographs. If so then I had great difficulty finding them on the internet. Again maybe he prefers print rather than internet.
Although I like the blog there’s something about it that makes me a bit uneasy. First he really seems to have it in for Ming Thein. Don’t get me wrong these attacks are not directed at Ming himself, as much as they are about what he represents: a certain type of photography pundit that appears to thrive on the internet. He’s even somewhat complementary (very rarely) to some of Ming’s work. I understand, and largely agree, with what he’s saying but after a while harping on this issue becomes too much. The first couple were fun, but after a while I started to thing “Oh no! Not another piece on Ming Thein”. As Internet attacks go though his anti-Ming diatribes are quite mild. Maybe I’m over-reacting. After all I’m British and as someone once said the British and excruciatingly polite to their enemies and insult their friends.
As mentioned above the author is very good at opinion pieces. However, it would be wise not to forget that these are just that:opinions – not gospel. I have a friend who is somewhat similar. He can formulate opinions extremely quickly, perhaps faster then anyone else I know. He too is also very articulate and expresses his opinions quite forcefully. He comes across as if he has all the answers. Unfortunately, knowing him as I do I also know that often his quickly formed opinions are based on quite scanty knowledge. There’s nothing wrong with this and I admire him greatly for the way he’s able to do it. It’s very much a case of ‘buyer beware’. It’s up to those receiving the opinions to validate their worth. The reader must not uncritically take on the views of the author just because they sound convincing.
There’s an interesting section For Beginners.
I heartily recommend this blog. Go take a look!