Two New Photobooks

A friend of mine grew up quite close to Yellowstone National Park and from time to time speaks of it fondly. Since I’ve never been there and don’t have any plans to go there any time soon, I thought I’d get a couple of books instead.

The first is titled: “Yellowstone. A Land of Wild and Wonder” by Christopher Cauble. It’s an attractive 11×11 inch color photobook with a dust cover bearing the same image as that on the front cover of the book. According to the book’s “About the Photographer”:

Christopher Cauble grew up in Helena, Montana where he began his passion for photography by exploring the mountains with a 35mm camera passed down from his parents. After graduating from the University of Montana with a bachelor’s degree in geography, he became a freelance photographer working mostly in Montana and Yellowstone National Park. His work has been featured in magazines and books, including A Montana Journal and the popular children’s book, What I saw in Yellowstone. Cauble is also a dedicated nature cinematographer, and his videos have been published on many national and international news sites and television programs. He lives near Yellowstone in Livingstone, Montana, with his wife, Sarah. His work can be found on his website, www.caublephotography.com and on social media.

The book has 120 pages, which, apart from a short (approx. half page) introduction are all beautiful photographs covering landscapes, wildlife and thermals.

The second book is called “Found Photos of Yellowstone. Yellowstone’s History in tourist and employee photographs. It’s a 176-page softcover book full of black and white, historical photographs divided into thirteen sections:

  • Foreword
  • Introduction
  • From Rustic to Refined
  • The Wonders of Wonderland
  • Getting Around Was Half the Fun
  • The Evolution of Camping
  • Activities Abound
  • Hard Work and Lots of Play
  • Famous Figures
  • Exploring Yellowstone Dude Ranch Style
  • Time Well Spent: Civilian Conservation Corps
  • The U.S. Military to the Rescue
  • Wildlife Attractions

Amazon describes it as follows:

“Found Photos of Yellowstone” presents a collection of over 200 photographs, captured by park visitors and employees between 1880 and 1940. These unguarded snapshots unveil unseen moments from the park’s past, offering unique perspectives on accommodation, transportation, leisure activities, wildlife, and summer employment. The images were discovered by Michael Francis, a seasoned Yellowstone photographer, who has amassed a collection of over 11,000 historic Yellowstone photographs. Each image in this book has been carefully selected by renowned Yellowstone historian Lee Whittlesey, who also co-authored the captions with acclaimed writer Amy Grisak. These pictures are sure to astonish and charm all Yellowstone enthusiasts. They illustrate the transformation of Yellowstone over the years, while also highlighting the enduring charm that has captivated visitors and employees for over a century”.

It’s quite different from the Cauble book. Where that book is pretty much entirely photographs, this one is rich in text. There’s a short, two-page introduction and each of the sections has its own description. The photographs all have detailed captions. Another way it differs from the Cauble book is that it doesn’t just show the awe-inspiring vistas, wildlife, thermals etc. Apart from tiny figures near the base of Grand Geyser and Old Faithful, there are no people. There’s only one photograph of a building: “Old Faithful Geyser and Inn Under the Milky Way”. I was surprised to find that contrary to what some of Cauble photographs suggest, Old Faithful is not “in the middle of nowhere”. Rather it’s a stone’s throw from the Old Faithful Inn.

This book shows that there were a number of beautiful, old, rustic Inns at one time. Have they all gone? Apparently not, as a cursory Google search reveals that a number of them are still operational. This book is full of people enjoying themselves, buildings and other structures, vehicles (cars, boats, trains, horse drawn carriages etc.).

So, which one do I prefer…

The photographs in the Cauble photobook are definitely superior: sharp, well composed, well exposed by a very talented professional who clearly knows how to produce lovely images. I enjoyed the book, but somehow, it didn’t touch me. Apart from creating a feeling of awe at the beauty of Yellowstone the photographs didn’t really inspire any other feelings. This may be typical of landscape photography. When I first started taking photography seriously in the late 1970s, Ansel Adams was starting to become very popular. At that time, I felt that this was the type of photography I wanted to do. I wanted to be Ansel Adams. I have a number of books of Adams photography, and I still admire him for all the things he did, both for photography and for nature conservancy in general. However, I recently looked through one of the books: “Ansel Adams. 400 photographs“. I was surprised to find that only a few of the 400 photographs made me feel anything much. The photographs in the Francis book are nowhere near as good as those in the Cauble book. They’re just snapshots, but I suspect that they give a more accurate picture of the real Yellowstone. I can feel the joy of people having a great time; sadness that maybe a simpler age has now gone; excitement while looking at the beautiful hotels, etc.

But then again maybe that’s just me. I love photography, but I also love history (I’m the Vice President of our local historical society), so my preference if for “Found Pictures of Yellowstone”.

A new lens

I bought this lens for a few reasons:

  • I came across some reviews on YouTube, all of which were favorable.
  • I wanted to see for myself if it was really as good as the reviews suggested.
  • Although I had a few vintage lenses, I didn’t have a modern 50mm lens for my Sony e-mount cameras.
  • It was inexpensive (less than $100).

So how did I like the lens:

  • A solid lens. Well made. Not in the least “plasticky”.
  • It’s manual focus. This is very subjective. Some people love manual focus, others not so much. I started out using manual focus lenses, so I don’t have a problem with this. Indeed, it can be good as it slows you down and makes you think more about your images. It can also be bad if you’re trying to photograph fast moving subjects.
  • It vignettes a lot. Again subjective. I rather like vignettes, and in any case the vignette is easy to fix in post-production.
  • It’s a little soft wide open but is clears up as you stop down.
  • I’ve read that the lens flares badly, but I was never in a situation where flare would be a problem, so I can’t really comment.
  • Average minimum focus distance (around two feet).
  • Pincushion distortion is noticeable but can be fixed in post-production.
  • Not a lens that will yield great bokeh in any situation, but in many situations, it yields appealing results.
  • Lateral chromatic aberration is OK except for around the edges and in the corners. Can be corrected in post-production. Longitudinal chromatic aberration is surprisingly good.

It’s a fun lens. I like the colors, it’s sharp enough for my needs and I also like some of its “flaws” (e.g. the vignetting). It has the character of a vintage lens but with superior performance. It’s inexpensive (approx $69), small, light, and provides a pleasant shooting experience akin to lenses from the film era. However, it costs less than a vintage 50mm on eBay and will be less bulky than a vintage lens and its adaptor.

I’m sure there will be those who complain about its inadequate sharpness; its tendency to flare; it’s vignetting; its distortion etc. That’s fine. Let them go for their huge, expensive, close to perfect optically, and, dare I say it, rather soulless lenses. For me I like a little character and for this price you really can’t go wrong.

I’m very pleased with my purchase.








All pictures (except for the first) taken with a Sony A7IV and TTartisans 50mm f2.

At Ossining Station

In the preceding post (See:At Scarborough Station) I mentioned that I had a choice of two stations when I was going into New York City. In that post I chose to go to Scarborough.

For this post I chose to go to Ossining.

As is often the case strong winds blow down the Hudson. On this day they were not only strong, but very cold so I sought refuge in one of the shelters on the platform. These shelters are like large glass boxes. There’s nowhere to sit, but there is a large button that you can press to get heat. These pictures were taken through the shelter windows.



At Scarborough Station

I was taking the train to meet some friends in New York City. I have a choice of two stations: Ossining and Scarborough. They’re both about the same distance from my house. When we were commuting into the city for work, we always used Scarborough, largely because we were entitled to village parking.

However, of late I no longer need the parking, so I tend to use Ossining more, as the facilities are better: places to sit, wait, have snack, have a drink, access to taxis etc. Scarborough has none of this.

On this occasion I chose to go to Scarborough.

It was a strange day: reasonably clear by the station, but extremely hazy over the river. It was so bad that at times you could barely see the other side of the river.

I thought I might get some decent photos. Here are the results.




Taken with a Sony RX100 VII

And now for something completely different

At least for me.

After one of our last snowfalls, it got very cold and windy. I was a bit bored, but didn’t want to go out because it was so cold. I was in my kitchen when I noticed that the strong winds were blowing these tall weeds, waiting to be removed come Spring. I hadn’t done much black and white lately, so I thought I’d go with that. Add a slow shutter speed to blur the image and this is what you get.





Taken with a Sony RX10 IV